This service is no longer live but has been archived for information purposes only. Click here for more info.
 
Issue

The war in Iraq

First we were in now we are out: but the confusion and controversy does not stop there.

Submitted 6/5/2007 By erinkoneill Views 80696 Comments 5 Updated 9/22/2008


Photographer : Jayel Aheram

Rock the kasbah: Australia’s military involvement in Iraq


In June 2008, 550 Australian combat soldiers made their way home from Iraq. It was just what Prime Minister Kevin Rudd had promised. In the lead up to his election, Rudd famously described Australia’s involvement in Iraq as the “single greatest error” of Australian national security since Vietnam. John Howard expressed his bafflement at Rudd’s decision, maintaining that there was still much for Australian forces to do in Iraq.

In 2003, when the United States first announced their plans to invade Iraq, the Howard government said that Australian troops were obligated to participate as part of the ANZUS Treaty. The 1951 treaty is an agreement between Australia, New Zealand and the US to come to the aid of the other when attacked.

The Australian Government supported the Bush administration’s claim that establishing a democratic government in Iraq would spread pro-Western democracies in the Middle East and prevent future terrorist attacks by eliminating Islamic radicalism. Six years into the war, this vision is looking largely idealistic.

By March 2003, there were 2000 Australian troops committed to action in Iraq. Howard gave the go-ahead for Australian armed forces to engage Iraqi forces on 18 March 2003. Australian Special Air Service (SAS) forces were in battle on the ground a day before the US began bombing Baghdad in one of the first battles of the war.

The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) confirmed in its 2002-2003 annual report that Australia was considered a potential target by al-Qaeda. In 2008, a speech by an ASIO representative in Canberra identified that al-Qaeda terrorism was still a very real threat, but that Australian security organisations had been able to successfully prevent any attacks in Australia so far.

I fought the law: the domestic debate

While John Howard was busy committing Australian troops to the war in Iraq, the Opposition (then Labor) claimed there was no real proof that Iraq had or could produce Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). They argued that thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians could be killed if the war went ahead.

In February 2003, anti-war protests occurred all over Australia, including one in Byron Bay, NSW, where 700 women used their naked bodies to form the message “No War”. A protest in Melbourne drew 150,000 people. In March 2003, two protesters were arrested for painting “No War” on the roof of the Sydney Opera House.

Those in favour of leaving Iraq said that because Saddam Hussein was no longer a threat and since no evidence of an Iraqi WMD program had been found, Australia had no business continuing to be there.

Official war operations ended in May 2003, and Australia scaled down their military commitment to 1000 troops. When Howard lost the election in 2007, there were 550 Australian combat soldiers left in Iraq. These were the soldiers that were brought home under Rudd’s election promise.

Two Australians have been killed in action, in 2005 and 2006; both after the war had officially ended.

Clampdown: Saddam in power

Saddam Hussein came to power in Iraq in 1979. He was a member of the nationalist-socialist Ba’ath party, and had assisted in the coup that brought them to power in 1968. Throughout Hussein’s rule there were reports of routine human rights abuses, including the use of chemical weapons on the Kurds in northern Iraq, the torture of political dissidents, and the disappearance of citizens.

In 1990, Iraqi forces invaded Kuwait, a small but oil-rich nation, over a conflict about who owned the oil reserves near the Iraq-Kuwait border. The United Nations (UN) tried to neutralise the conflict, however when Iraq invaded, the United States led a UN force to protect Kuwait’s sovereignty. Australia, as a member of the UN, sent in 1800 personnel to assist in this conflict known as Operation Desert Storm.

The UN placed Iraq under economic sanctions (prohibiting trade with Iraq), in 1990 to prevent further military action against Kuwait. In 1995 the UN established the Oil for Food Program, which allowed Iraq to sell its oil for food and medicine. Due to corruption in the program, the Iraqi people suffered even more intensely after it began.

The UN also passed resolutions forbidding Iraq to develop or possess Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). UN Weapons Inspectors were sent in; however, Saddam Hussein was uncooperative. This included an incident in October 1998 when Iraq ceased cooperation and the UN pulled all weapons inspectors, headed by Australian Richard Butler at the time, out of the country. The US and the UK bombed Baghdad for four days in December that year to get the inspectors reinstated. They were not successful: Iraq never allowed UN weapons inspectors back into the country.

Straight to hell: the lead up to war in Iraq

Following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, the US led an international force in Afghanistan to remove the Taliban from power and search for al-Qaeda leader, Osama Bin Laden.

The search for Bin Laden failed. U.S President George W. Bush and his administration claimed Iraq had direct links with the Taliban and al-Qaeda. They claimed that Hussein had the ability to produce WMD and was an immediate threat to the national security of any western nation.

The U.S sought support from other western nations including Australia to invade Iraq and rid it of WMD. They first tried to get a UN resolution passed to allow military action in Iraq, but that failed.

Hate and war: civil war in Iraq

After Hussein’s fall, an interim government was set up by the coalition forces. However, a power struggle erupted between the three major religious and cultural factions in Iraq: the Shia, the Sunnis and the Kurds.

The Shia and Sunnis are two sects of Islam: both follow the teachings of the Koran, but believe that different people inherited the right to interpret the Koran after the death of Prophet Muhammad. The Shia (also known as Shiite) majority were persecuted under Hussein, who was a member of the Sunni minority. The Kurds in Iraq are an ethnic and linguistic minority in the north.

The government in Iraq is now struggling to control the insurgency. Insurgents have targeted foreign soldiers as well as Iraqi civilians and infrastructure.

Train in vain: should there still be a western presence in Iraq?

Iraq has become a massive humanitarian crisis, with anywhere between 87,000 and 95,000 civilian deaths since March 2003. The death toll for American soldiers is around 4000. There are around 2.8 million Iraqis who are ‘internally displaced’ and are struggling to find access to shelter, food, water and basic services.

Humanitarian assistance is desperately needed – but Iraq remains one of the most dangerous places in the world, even if you are just there to help. There is much criticism of the lack of a realistic plan to re-build post-Saddam Iraq and a viable exit strategy.

Even though the UK and Australia have withdrawn troops, the U.S sees their role as ongoing over the next few years at least. Nevertheless, even President Bush has decided to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq. He has promised to bring 8000 soldiers home by February 2009.

Those who believe in staying the course in Iraq say that the country is too unstable, that the bloodshed will increase, and the Sunni-Shia civil war in Iraq could escalate into a regional conflict. It would also give al-Qaeda a symbolic victory. There is fear that without troops in Iraq, the country could become a breeding ground for terrorists.

Author’s Note: The section titles are indebted to the Clash.

This page was updated by kate elise

How do I know this?

Australian Intelligence Annual Report 2002-2003 http://www.asio.gov.au/Publications/Content/  AnnualReport02_03/pdf/Annual_report02_03.pdf

Chehab, Zaki. “Sunni v. Shia” http://www.newstatesman.com/200702120009  

Iraq Body Count http://www.iraqbodycount.org/  

‘Iraq displacement & return 2008 mid-year review’, International Organization for Migration, http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/  crisis/2008/2008displacementreview.pdf

Iraq: Systematic torture of political prisoners, Amnesty International, 15 August 2001 http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engMDE140082001

Richmond, Sheldon “Iraqi Sanctions: Were They Worth It?” January 2004. http://ww.globalpolicy.org/security/sanction/iraq1/  2004/01sanctionsworth.htm  

Robinson, Eugene, “US Halts Attacks on Iraq after Four Days,” The Washington Post, 20 December 1998. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/stories/end122098.htm  

SAS role in Iraq Revealed, The Sydney Morning Herald, 9 May 2003 http://www.smh.com.au/articles/- 2003/05/09/1052280430667.html   

Sheridan, Greg, ‘Telling blows in the war on terror’, The Australian, 18 September 2008 www.theaustralian.news.com.au  

Smith, Tanalee, ‘Australia Ends Iraq Combat Operations’, ABC News, 1 June 2008, www.abcnews.go.com  

Silva, Mark “We stand together in 'decisive struggle,'” Cheney says in Australia, Chicago Tribune (IL), Feb 23, 2007.

United Nations Resolution 1205, adopted 5 November 1998. http://www.casi.org.uk/info/undocs/scres/1998/sres1205.htm  

The War in Iraq: ADF Operations in the Middle East in 2003 http://www.defence.gov.au/publications/lessons.pdf  

War in Iraq 2003, Australian War Memorial http://www.awm.gov.au/iraq/index.asp   

Williams, Clive “Australia's continuing presence in Iraq remains unclear,” The Canberra Times 8 March 2007 http://canberra.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?class=your%20say&subclass=general&story_id=563938&category=Opinion  

This work is licenced under an Attribution licence.
© 2008. First published on actnow.com.au

Tell me about creative commons licences

Discuss Now

Post Comment

RSS Comments
image

RebeccaS 02-Apr-2008

Very well written--must have been difficult to be unbiased, but well done! I agree that the situation is quite a mess, with no forseeable end in sight. The US government must ask themselves if they are really completing their original goals (do they really even know what their goals are anymore?). The US election will be interesting to watch--the candidates have differing ideas on how to improve the situation.

-----

image

katie719 02-Apr-2008

So well written!
As a U.S. citizen, and not necessarily a Geaorge Bush fan whatsoever, I cannot find the rationale in making such an effort to "rid the middle east of terrorists", but just focusing in on one main area. Many parts of Africa harbour terrorits, and I think this, to GWB, was more about oil than anything. The US is the number one oil producer in the world, so it is hard to believe that that has nothing to do with it. Also a fun fact, Bush has made some 275+ falsifications to justify the Iraq war. One I found interesting was he was working to ensure that the genocide taking place was put to an end. But why, then, do we not have more troops and more global support in a place like Darfur, where there are not near as many resources? So many people have so many hidden agendas.

-----

image

LukeMR 10-Aug-2007

Great summary Erin,

It's a real mess that's for sure. I can't say I agree with anyone who says we should up and leave completely, but in staying we must have workable goals...namely that we should stay until we can ensure basic bureaucratic necessities like health, schooling, food security. As for staying until the violence stops, that is an utter imposibility in my opinion and we'd probably do more harm than good.

When I say we, in reality I really mean the US, more than us. But in saying that, we should stay until the goals I discussed earlier are achieved. We helped create the mess, whether you supported the war in the begining shouldn't cloud ones decision on whether staying is a good idea.



-----

image

funnelweb 16-Jun-2007

This is perhaps one of the best well-written and impartial pieces on the war in Iraq that I have ever read. Well done to you and I look forward to more articles from you in future!

One thing missing perhaps (and i am NOT defending the US) is that the US did attempt multiple times to pass resolutions but this was rejected by France, Russia and China, three powers with veto power and who vowed they would veto any war against Iraq no matter what. It is interesting that France had contracts with Saddam regarding Power plants and factories, Russia with weapons and China with oil. But looking back now, Iraq is NOT better off, the US has spent many tens of billions on the war which has achieved nothing and WMDs were never, ever found.

-----

image

Meli 05-Jun-2007

Nicely written.

I’m amazed that it isn’t obvious to our governments that if anything, provoking Iraq will probably make terrorism worse. Terrorism can’t be solved by terrorising civilians and giving them reason to want revenge. It’s disgusting that the war was allowed to happen after no WMD were found, and that powerful countries can ignore the UN so easily. It also sucks that one reason our government supported the war was to ‘liberate the Iraqi people’, but we're hardly welcoming of asylum seekers who come from those areas.

-----