Too much sex, not enough talk

STIs are on the rise sparking calls for a national platform for sex education. Benny shares his views on sex, schools and politics.

Submitted 15/05/2007 By Benny89 Views 24946 Comments 9 Updated 13/06/2007


Photographer : Sean94110@Flickr


Kids these days are having sex younger and they’re doing it more often. Who can blame us? It’s fun, exciting and cheaper than a movie. But while we’re having more sex, it seems we’re not doing it properly. Unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are spreading at a shocking rate and not much is being done to stop them.

All sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are on the rise in Australia, including the big one, HIV/AIDS. Most alarming is the rise in Chlamydia infections; the rate of infection has doubled in the last five years. If you’ve had, or plan on having sex anytime soon, and you think this isn’t relevant to you—think again. In fact, if you’re a woman it’s likely that at some stage you will be infected with Chlamydia—60% of women and 25% of men will get it.

Chlamydia is not fun. It can destroy your reproductive system, cause premature arthritis, disfigure your genitals with warts and cause birth defects. If that wasn’t bad enough, it can make pus leak out of your penis or vagina—and that’s sooo not hot right now. But don’t stress too much, it can be prevented with a condom and cured with a single pill if it’s caught early enough.

In fact lots of harmful STIs can be treated and even cured if they are caught in the early stages of infection. However, some STIs have no cure. AIDS will kill you, but only after destroying your muscles, giving you painful infections, agonising chills, fevers, cancers and hallucinations.

Most of what I’ve written so far is something most young Australians don’t know (I didn’t). We don’t know why we should get ourselves tested for STIs and we don’t know how to. When you mix risk and sex it should mean doing it on a train, not without a condom.

That's why there have been calls for the federal government to set up a national sex education platform to teach us about the birds and the bees. Though many people agree with the idea, everyone’s arguing about what should be taught. Some of what should be taught is mentioned above—the course should cover STIs, sexuality, pregnancy, condom use, risk and relationships. It can’t be overly technical or boring, which shouldn’t be too hard, because after all, sex is fun!

Kids and condoms

There are three main barriers to setting up a national program. Firstly, some people think it’s solely the job of parents to talk to kids about sex. They need a reality check. Most parents don’t want to talk to their kids about sex—they’re not trained, they don’t have the information and for some it’s just plain weird. What’s more, not all kids have great relationships with their parents and for many, talking about sex with mum and dad just aint kool.

The other barrier is the age thing. The average age for loss of virginity is now 16 years old, so education really needs to start in primary school. Yet the idea of young children being taught about sex doesn’t sit well with some adults. Currently there are no requirements for schools to teach sex ed, and most schools that do, start well into the secondary years.

Then there are those (some of whom run schools) that object passionately to the whole condom thing because of religious reasons. They believe in teaching abstinence and only abstinence, that is, ‘no sex before marriage’. In fact our federal Health Minister Tony Abbot, a committed catholic, told Triple J’s Hack that he didn’t want to create a ‘condom culture’.

This attitude is a big problem because condoms are recognised by doctors as being the most effective way of stopping the transmission of STIs and preventing unwanted pregnancies. Studies show that teaching abstinence just doesn’t work and actually leads to kids have sex younger with less protection. Surprise surprise, we want what we’re told we can’t have.

Let’s talk about sex

The silence isn’t working, things are just getting worse. This is not just an education issue; it's a health issue with lives at stake. We should be given complete information about our options so that we can make our own decisions. We should also have a say in what’s going to be taught.

If you’re interested in having better sex education on the national agenda, email a politician and let them know. In the meantime, educate yourself and check out the links to sexual health websites. Take charge of your health and get tested, it’s free and confidential. Above all, take sex out of the bedroom and discuss the issues, because the silence is literally killing us.

How do I know this?

Family Planning Victoria, www.fpv.org.au  

Lane, S 2007, ‘Abstinence-only programs don't work: report’, PM, 17 April, www.abc.net.au/reslib/200704/r138074_470941.mp3; www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1899734.htm

Lim, M, Hellard, M, Aitken, C & Hocking, J 2007, ‘Sexual-risk behaviour, self-perceived risk and knowledge of sexually transmissible infections among young Australians attending a music festival’ Sexual Health, 4(1)

Milburn, C 2006, ‘Think Sex’, The Age, 29 May, www.theage.com.au/news/education-news/think-sex/2006/05/28/1148754861223.html  

O’Toole, K 2007, ‘What ever happened to safe sex’, Hack, 15 February, www.abc.net.au/triplej/hack/notes/mp3s/sex_special.mp3; www.abc.net.au/triplej/hack/notes/s1849439.htm

Reach Out!, www.reachout.com.au

Scarleteen, Sex education for the real world, www.scarleteen.com  

Sexual Health Network, www.sexualhealth.com  

SHine, www.shinesa.org.au  

your sex health, www.yoursexhealth.org

This work is licenced under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence.
© 2008. First published on actnow.com.au

Tell me about creative commons licences

Discuss Now

Post Comment 1 | 2 |

RSS Comments
image

Tambo 05-Jul-2008

Great article and comments everyone. I'm originally from England, and when i was at school we had one lesson of PSHE every week from year 7. This lesson introduced us sexual education and taught us the importance of safe sex. The lessons also delved into the responsibilities of raising a child and how a child can and will effect your life especially if having a child at an early age. I think this is what shocked everyone the most. I remember thinking that your life will come to an end when you have kids, and that was something i didn't want to happen. We were also taught about the many different type of sexual diseases, and were even shown the graphic images!!! I'm not sure how much this kind of lesson actually works, but i do know that while i was at school, not one student fell pregnant, where as neighbouring school who didn't offer this lesson did have a few problems with pregnant students.

Maybe a similar lesson taught from around year 7 to educate students on the use of safe sex as well as the effects that having a child or contracting a STDs can have on you would be a great start. I believe the education of safe sex combined with the shock tactics of seeing the outcome of not being careful does work, or at least it did in my case and for many of my friends.

Is it to crazy to offer free condoms to students at secondary school? Will this make them want to have sex more or will it teach them to be careful? I'm not sure. We have free condoms donated to our uni by an Australia online condom store, http://www.condomshop.com.au.


-----

image

katastrophic 21-Feb-2008

fantastic opinion piece

another model to sex ed is thru peer education
(training up young people to talk to their friends)

talking not only about sex
but about healthy relationships
self esteem
negotiating safe/r sex
or talking about other ways to be intimate without putting yourself or your partner/s at risk (so - if you dont have condom & lube, maybe not having penetrative sex)

one whole of community peer ed approach is snake condoms http://www.mariestopes.org.au/country-aust-proj2.html

and the early detection program http://www.mariestopes.org.au/country-aust-proj4.html

altho these focus on indigenous young people, the model can be adapted to be culturally and contextually appropriate to different groups of young people.
it also can get around the issue of school politics maybe?

what do other people think?


peace

-----

image

Benny 28-Oct-2007

Sex and Schoolies

Chlamydia increase

The head of a sexual health service says chlamydia is on the increase in young people, and people attending schoolies should take precautions.

The CEO of Marie Stopes International, a not-for-profit organisation, says the majority of year 12 students are sexually active and schoolies celebrations is a time when they may take risks.

Jill Michaelson says 47,000 people were notified last year that they had the sexually transmitted infection (STI) chlamydia, which can cause pelvic infections.

"Half of those were between the 15 to 24-year age group so it's really important we get to this age group of people," she said.

"Unfortunately with chlamydia it's an STI which goes under the radar and there are very few if any symptoms and so people don't know they are carrying the infection."
http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/25/2070204.htm

-----

image

karinarules 22-Oct-2007

thank you so much for writing this article! I saw it in Our People magazine and was gobsmacked that not only did someone feel the same way as me but that such an important issue got coverage in a youth publication. I am doing my thesis this year in exactly this topic. I agree there should be a National curriculum to address sex ed. And the idea about roaming sex ed groups is a great idea! I'll be sure to let you know the results of my survey- asking students what THEY want to see in a sex ed program and checking out what they do and don't know. Thanks again!

-----

image

Kim 06-Jun-2007

The problem with implementing a school program is that not all schools want their students to have sex on their radars (eg. religious schools as you rightfully pointed out Benny!). Most children at that age are brimming with so many hormones that even the slightest hint of sex could tip them over them edge. Not too mention, it still leaves the divide between children and parents knowledge.

The info nights that I attended were only advertised at school, and in the newsletter (not enforced or built into the curriculum) and it was then up to the parents to take the children, and because it was at night, they are less likely to be working and able to attend. Which then leaves the question: what if you parents are religious and don't want to take you? Can there be away around the sex-religion barrier?

What if there was a 2-step national program: one part sex-education and the other health-education? It could be a start!

-----